Gates Got Arrested Because He Hurt Sgt. Crowley's Feelings

The arrest of Professor Henry Louis Gates is an example of poor police work, to be charitable, and the vestiges of racial relationships between Black and White men.  The police officer, after having been presented with two valid identification cards demonstrating who Gates was and where he lived, should have simply moved on.  He didn't.  According to the first-person account I read on The Root, the officer didn't do that, ignored reasonable requests by Gates, and was joined by numerous police officers for backup.  Gates, likely tired after a long flight from China only to be greeted by a front door that was disabled in what may have been an attempted break-in, was likely offended that the officer didn't immediately bring the matter to a close. As a Black man, I've been there and can easily believe that the officer thought Gates was insufficiently deferential and was looking to knock the professor down a peg or two.

Gates' commentary during the incident didn't help and I willing to bet that he may, at some point, regret some of what he said.  But the reality is: once the officer confirmed Gates' identification and address, then the officer should have ended the situation.  Ultimately, Gates got arrested because he hurt Sgt. Crowley’s feelings. That won’t hold up in any court of law.  And prosecutors declined to prosecute because they knew the arrest was complete garbage.

I think it's folly to ignore the history of race in the interaction between some White men and some Black men.  From calling grown men "boy" to the well-documented cases of race-based violence, upstanding Black men are not willing to accept the behavior exhibited by that police officer.  For every Henry Louis Gates, with resources, notoriety, and connections, there are countless others like him who have to live with the reality of racism is anonymity. We don't need hypersensitive cops who didn't like the fact that a Black man stood up and required respect and professionalism.  Professionalism should have prevailed.  Now, the Cambridge police force will pay in the form of a damaged reputation and, perhaps, even monetarily too.  All because one officer got mad because his feelings were hurt.

July 22, 2009 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341cfdfc53ef0115712fe876970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Gates Got Arrested Because He Hurt Sgt. Crowley's Feelings:

Comments

I think you are way off base on this issue. From the officers point of view he was investigating a possible break in at the house. The officer did not know who owned the home, who lived there, how many people lived there, etc. As the officer approaches the home he has only the information given to him by his dispatch and the caller who met him near the sidewalk. As he speaks with Dr. Gates he is immediately called a racist. Dr. Gates then began to speak about the officers mother in a derogatory manner. Is this the image of a professor at a fantastic university? Regardless of how long his flight was from China, should an education person of any race act like Dr. Gates did?
There are so many different scenarios going through the mind of the officer on scene. He has a duty to ask for identification from the person he encountered at the scene of a break in. If he had simply left the scene without receiving proof, what if this man hadn't actually lived there. You just let a burglar go free. What is Gates had proper identification for the address but was under court order to stay away from the address. This can happen in situations of domestic violence. If Gates had been ordered to stay away from the address he cohabitates with a partner, he cannot be there. But he would certainly have proper identification to be there. Frequently the address in which the accussed lives in the area where the victim stays as well. So if you officer had left the scene without checking all possible scenarios, who knows what might have happened. There is a lot more going on than supposed "racism." I would argue that Dr. Gates is only accusing the officer because the officer is white. Isn't that racist in and of itself. If a black officer had been first on scene and handled the situation exactly the same, would he still be racist? The clear fact is that the officer did his job to policy and to proper policing. The african american officer on scene completely agreed with Sgt. Crowleys response. So is the african american officer racist too? Or did Dr. Gates act in a manner that disturbed the peace and that is what he was arrested for? The officer cannot simply check his ID and walk away. There are thousands of scenarios he has to account for in this situation. The author of this article or the respondents obviously have never bothered to view the situation from a police officers perspective. You only want to gain notoriety or money from the situation. As for Dr. Gates, he got out of a criminal charge by claiming the race card. I state that he himself was racist and not the officer.

Posted by: Trevor | Jul 29, 2009 2:51:41 PM

This is what I've been saying all along. Although there may have been some racial implications, I think it was more about Prof. Gates not showing Crowley the "proper respect." As a criminal defense attorney, I see this frequently. About some clients we say: "they didn't pass the 'attitude test'" I have also personally experienced this kind of treatment by police, and I'm a white female. Cops have a great deal of power and authority, and often use it inappropriately (and sometimes illegally).

Posted by: gjkenney | Jul 29, 2009 1:29:28 PM

Thank you. I had been thinking the same thing. Dr. Gates proved who he was and it was his home, and the officer should have said, "I apologize for bothering you, but we have to check all breaking and entering reports. I hope you had a good trip to China...welcom back." End of incident.

Posted by: d madsen | Jul 29, 2009 11:35:49 AM

Your article on Huffington Post was great. Would you please do a story on how Sgt. Crowley lied.

Posted by: gogirl | Jul 28, 2009 9:14:15 PM

Post a comment






 

blog advertising is good for you

Beltway Bloggers Network

PhD Pontificators Network